A Scottish MEP has commended Germany's offer to house 800,000 refugees in contrast to the "sheer panic" expressed by other European leaders.
Alyn Smith said Scotland stands ready to offer sanctuary to refugees, while the UK Government "struggles to show leadership".
New migration management proposals, including relocating 120,000 asylum seekers within the EU, were outlined by the European Commission and debated in the European Parliament in Strasbourg this week.
The Commission has put forward a package, including measures such as a common European list of safe countries of origin to ensure faster returns of those whose asylum request is rejected, legal migration channels to the EU and proposed a 1.8 billion euro (£1.3 billion) trust fund to help tackle the root causes for migration in Africa.
Mr Smith, and SNP MEP, said: "The scale, complexity and urgency of today's humanitarian crises are unprecedented. There is no easy solution and we cannot help everyone, but we must do everything in our power to help as many as possible.
"Europe must stand up for its values and live up to the expectations of many European citizens. Instead, we see a commendable action from our German colleagues and sheer panic in the voice of many other European leaders.
"The European Union is not just about grants, development funds and the single market. It's about values.
"This is our chance to show the world that the EU is committed to the principles of liberty, democracy and respect for human rights - the freedoms we all hold dear.
"While the UK Government struggles to show leadership, Scotland stands ready to offer sanctuary to refugees.
"The Syrian civil war, now entering its fifth year, is the main reason why we see a mass exodus of refugees. Until their homeland is safe, men, women and children will do anything to find safety.
"It is also crucial that we enhance our co-operation with accession candidate countries in confronting migration crisis.
"Unfortunately, news of violence and daily clashes between Turkish army and various Kurdish groups make that co-operation more difficult."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here