A bid to update council tax bands set more than 20 years ago has been launched in the Lords.
Tory Lord Marlesford's Council Tax Valuation Bands Bill would ensure the bands better reflected today's property prices.
It sets a new range of valuation bands starting at homes below £250,000 and rising to a top one for those over £20 million.
The change would apply only to homes bought or sold since April 2000. Those bought or sold before then would continue on the valuation bands first set in 1992.
Lord Marlesford said it was no longer fair or publicly acceptable that the most expensive properties paid just three times those of the lowest value under the present system.
Under the Bill, properties in the top band would pay £42,000 a year compared to the present of around £3,000, making a greater contribution to local government costs.
Hailing the change as "practical, cost-effective and much overdue," Lord Marlesford said council tax had served the country well but needed updating in England.
Tory Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury backed the Bill, saying it was anomalous that bankers and oligarchs living in very expensive homes currently were taxed at the same rate as those in "quite modest homes".
Communities and local government minister Baroness Williams of Trafford said the Government had reservations about the Bill, which was the "very picture of a punitive mansion tax," long opposed by ministers.
Lady Williams warned it established a two-tier system with potential complications for those administering it, creating confusion and unfairness.
"Residents of similar houses on the same street could face radically different council tax bills purely on the basis of when they bought their property."
She said the Government had no intention of conducting a full revaluation during this Parliament. There was no "public clamour" for change.
The Bill was given an unopposed second reading but without government support stands little chance of becoming law.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel