Nearly 10,000 people claiming benefits died in the space of a little over two years, after being declared potentially fit for work, according to new figures.
The statistics on the death rates of people claiming benefits were published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) after a lengthy battle during which the Government resisted publishing the information.
In response to freedom of information requests from campaigner and blogger Mike Sivier, work and pensions minister Iain Duncan Smith finally ordered the release of the details.
They show that between December 2011 and February 2014, 50,580 people died within 14 days of their Employment and Support Allowance claim ending. Of those 2,380 had been told they were fit for work. Another 7,200 had been put in the work-related activity group for people who had been assessed as unfit for work, but potentially able to work in the near future.
The DWP issued the figures with caveats warning that they did not provide any proof of a causal effect between benefits and mortality. However the TUC called for an inquiry into government welfare policies.
The DWP said a total of 81040 people had died while claiming Incapacity Benefit, Employment and Support Allowance or Severe Disability Allowance between December 2011 and February 2014.
It would not be unexpected for some claimants in these groups to die while claiming benefits as they would include people with chronic or terminal illnesses and life-limiting conditions.
However critics said the figures provided support for anecdotal evidence of people being wrongly declared fit for work.
Meanwhile the website fullfact.org said it was 'interesting' that the mortality rate for people placed in the work related activity group for ESA is more than twice as high as the mortality rate for the general population.
Journalist and blogger Mr Sivier said: "The DWP has strenuously asserted that “any causal effect between benefits and mortality cannot be assumed from these statistics”. It is correct to make this point.
"However, the increase in the frequency of these deaths is enough to raise questions about the way the incapacity benefit system is being run.
"For example, the work-related activity group is composed entirely of people who are expected to recover from their illnesses and be well enough to return to work within a year. In that group, there should be no deaths at all – barring accidents. Why have nearly 10,000 people lost their lives after being assigned there?"
TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: “We urgently need an enquiry into the government’s back-to-work regime. These disturbing findings cannot be swept under the carpet.
“The fact that more than 50 people are dying each month shortly after being declared ‘fit for work’ should concern us all. We need a welfare system that supports people to find decent jobs not one that causes stress and ill health.”
The DWP said the figures should be treated with caution, adding in its statement: "these isolated figures provide limited scope for analysis and nothing can be gained from this publication that would allow the reader to form any judgement as to the effects or impacts of the Work Capability Assessment."
A DWP spokesman added "The mortality rate for people who have died while claiming an out-of-work benefit has fallen over a 10-year period. This is in line with the mortality rate for the general working-age population.
"The Government continues to support millions of people on benefits with an £80 billion working-age welfare safety net in place."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel