BUSINESS leaders have condemned the appointment of lingerie entrepreneur Michelle Mone as the UK Government's start-up czar.
Senior figures are questioning why Ms Mone was chosen to lead a review of enterprise in poor areas after selling off most of her own small but loss-making bra firm.
One multi-millionaire has written to David Cameron urging the Tory leader not to make the "divisive" businesswoman a peer for the sake of the "unity of the UK".
Douglas Anderson of major tool and plant hire company the Gap Group told the Prime Minister that Ms Mone was "a small-time businesswoman with PR exposure far in excess of any success". He also cast doubts on her qualifications for the post.
Glasgow-based Gap employs 1300 people with annual revenues of £150 million a year.
Mr Anderson, reacting to reports that Ms Mone would be elevated to the House of Lords, said: "She certainly should not be awarded this title as a reward for supporting you in the No vote.
"This would be highly divisive among the very many successful entrepreneurs in Scotland and will drive them to the Yes camp."
His remarks came as senior Scottish Conservatives expressed private disquiet over Ms Mone, who has adopted a robust unionist persona on social media and in the press, being championed by Mr Cameron and other English colleagues.
A senior Scottish Conservative insider said: "It came as a surprise to me. And I can't see it ending well. A lot of people have grave reservations this will backfire badly."
Ms Mone has courted publicity for a decade and a half as she marketed her Ultimo brand of "chicken fillet" bras.
Her company MJM International suffered heavy losses of £780,000 in its last year, 2013, before passing its assets to its parent company, Ultimo Brands, which also made a loss, and ceasing to trade.
Both businesses only published the abbreviated accounts of a "small company". Ms Mone has sold most of Ultimo Brands to a firm from Sri Lanka but remains a director.
The 43-year-old was unveiled in her new unpaid post by Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith, who said there was "no-one better qualified to help young entrepreneurs from deprived backgrounds".
In a series of interviews, Ms Mone said she would travel "from Land's End to John O'Groats" to find ways to develop entrepreneurial flair in disadvantaged parts of Britain.
However, Mr Anderson said: “Her businesses have been no more than excessively over promoted PR minnows gaining unjustified acclaim due to the glamorous sector they happen to be in.
"The total number of jobs she has brought to the UK will be minimal.
"There is no way, by any measure, that she is qualified to advise anybody on setting up a profitable business, because quite simply, she hasn't!"
Another extremely successfully Scottish businessman and unionist, who asked not to be named, said: "I am amazed nobody in the Conservatives or the Government looked at her business record. If I was a Tory, I would be raging at this appointment. She has great PR but she isn't a big business success."
Ms Mone this year quit Scotland, citing abuse from so-called cybernats. She had previously threatened to leave the country if the SNP won the 2007 election or if there was a Yes vote in the 2014 independence referendum. Some unionists said they fear her aggressive stance was counter-productive to the cause.
Her spokesman said: “Michelle is delighted that the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions has, with the backing of the Secretary of State for Business and the Prime Minister of the UK, shown full confidence in her to fulfil this important new role.
"Both they and she believe that she has an immense amount to offer start-up businesses and future entrepreneurs throughout the UK based on her own successful business experience."
The Department of Work and Pensions, asked to explain what Ms Mone had achieved to make her a suitable start-up czar, said: "Michelle Mone’s business success is well documented. She is more than qualified to help young entrepreneurs from deprived backgrounds to turn a good idea into a flourishing business."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel