THE UK’s youngest MP has spoken of her frustration at some of Westminster's traditions, saying it must decide whether it is a museum or a functional parliament.
Mhairi Black, who as a 20-year-old student was voted the SNP MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire South in May, received praise for her maiden speech in the House of Commons.
Despite her early success, she says she is still getting used to some of the intricacies of Westminster, and that some of its foibles grate on her.
Black said she thinks the rule of no clapping in the House is senseless, saying: "So you're not allowed to clap like an ordinary person, but you're allowed to bray like a donkey?
"I mean, see PMQs, especially the Conservative side, they've got this weird noise they do. It actually sounds like a drunken mob."
Westminster must choose, she said, whether it is a museum or a functional parliament, saying: "It's constantly swinging between the two, and quite often they are at odds."
She also suggested the tradition of having to vote in person, rather than electronically, is outdated.
"Are we genuinely saying that the Underground can log millions of travellers, day in, day out, without a problem, and 650 of us can't hit a button?
"It's just stupid. A couple of Mondays ago, I didn't get home until half past midnight because we were voting. How is anybody with a family supposed to work those hours?"
Black admitted the moments she hates most at Westminster are those in the chamber, where "you just hear folk talking so much guff".
Also, in the interview with The Times, Black said she believed that the union is doomed, and that Scotland was giving the UK parliament once last chance with its referendum result last September.
She said: "I'd have another referendum tomorrow, but it's not up to me. It's up to the people of Scotland, and I think people are finding their feet and they're finding their confidence."
Black defeated senior Labour figure Douglas Alexander to take her place in Parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel