A former judge, who was jailed for lying to police investigating the Chris Huhne speeding points scandal, has lost her appeal against conviction.
Barrister and author Constance Briscoe, 57, was given a 16-month sentence after being found guilty of trying to pervert the course of justice over the investigation into how the former UK Energy Secretary passed points to his then-wife.
Briscoe was jailed after it emerged that she had helped economist Pryce, a friend and neighbour, to reveal information about Huhne's points-swapping to newspapers after the couple split in 2010. She was later removed from judicial office.
Lord Justice Davis, Mr Justice Supperstone and Judge Martyn Zeidman refused her permission to appeal against her conviction or to produce fresh expert computer forensic evidence.
She claimed that this would show there was a possible innocent explanation for differences between two witness statements she had provided and this would cast doubt on the safety of her conviction.
But, the judges at the Court of Appeal said that no reasonable explanation had been given for the failure to produce such evidence at her trial if it was thought it would assist the defence and, in any case, other possibilities were alluded to and left to the jury.
They said: "Having considered all the material before us, our conclusion is that there is no proper basis for receiving this proposed fresh evidence in the interests of justice.
"Such evidence, if relied on, could, with reasonable diligence, have been produced at trial.
"Further, and more importantly, we consider that it affords no ground for allowing the appeal."
Briscoe faces near bankruptcy, but was ordered to pay £3,000 costs. It will be up to the Crown to decide whether to enforce the order.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article