More than half a million children could be lifted out of poverty by reforming Universal Credit, the Government has been told.
The TUC and the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) have urged ministers to improve the credit rather than raising the income tax threshold to £12,500.
In a study of 13 options, the tax threshold proposal cost the most and came bottom for reducing child poverty.
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith has announced a new way of measuring child poverty, to include factors such as educational achievement and living in workless households as well as income.
But the TUC and CPAG said a package of improvements to Universal Credit including increasing work allowances, would reduce child poverty by 460,000.
TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady said: "The Government is right to think about giving more help to people in work on low earnings, but the Chancellor should look carefully at the most effective way of doing it before making a final decision on raising the tax threshold."
Alison Garnham, chief executive of the CPAG, said: "This comprehensive analysis shows the Chancellor must be careful not to back the wrong horse when it comes to the Government's flagship policies.
"Rather than committing billions on the costly and poorly targeted policy of raising the personal tax allowance, the Treasury should stop starving universal credit of the investment it needs to fulfil its poverty-reducing potential and justify the massive upheaval surrounding it.
"The evidence is clear that investment in tax credits is incredibly effective in lifting children out of poverty."
A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: "Universal Credit is already transforming the lives of some of the poorest families in our communities, with claimants moving into work faster and earning more than under the old system."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article