EXPERTS have called for a revamp of the methods used to predict the amount of noise generated by onshore windfarms, saying that the current system of modelling is failing the public.
A study into the visual and aural impact of turbines at ten sites in Scotland found has said that more care should be taken to identify noise issues, and that more consideration should be given to its impact on people living nearby.
The report, carried out by the think tank ClimateXChange, is the first of its kind to compare the predicted effects of windfarm developments to what happened after the banks of turbines were switched on.
It found that Scotland's wind-powered renewable energy sites met with current planning regulations, but suggested that these should be reviewed to ensure that future developments achieve consistency in future.
Among issues raised by the report was that some assessments and public engagement activities had not adequately prepared residents for the impacts of the operational wind farm, and that the impacts predicted in documents submitted with developers' planning applications did not always match the reality of the completed project.
Ragne Low, Project Manager for ClimateXChange said: "As the study has focussed on issues relating to the planning process, we are confident that the findings will feed into improved practice in measuring the predicted impacts of proposed wind farms, and in communicating this to decision-makers and those likely to be affected."
He added that they point to several possible improvements to guidance and good practice, some of which have already been implemented.
Linda Holt, spokesperson for Scotland Against Spin, which campaigns for reform of wind energy policy, said: "This study is the first of its kind in the world to put the the experience of people living near wind farms at its heart. For too long, people who have complained about wind farms have been dismissed as nimbies.
"The recommendations show that the planning system is ill-equipped to address potentially adverse impacts on wind farm neighbours, and we urge the Scottish Government to lose no time in implementing them."
A Scottish Renewables spokesman said it highlights the high standards of guidance available for windfarm planners.
A Scottish Government spokesman said the study shows improvements have already been made to planning, and it is rigorous and ensures appropriate siting of wind farms.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article