A DROP in the number of hate crimes at football matches may have nothing to do with controversial legislation that was designed to stamp out sectarianism on the terraces, MSPs have said.
The SNP's Offensive Behaviour at Football Act came under scrutiny at Holyrood following publication of research which warned that the law, introduced at the end of the 2011-12 season, had put new strains on relations between police and supporters with many fans believing prosecutions for singing songs were heavy handed.
The study, conducted by the University of Stirling and ScotCen Research, came as it was revealed that the number of crimes recorded under the Act had dropped by 28 per cent since it was introduced.
Paul Wheelhouse, Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs, said that the law had been introduced in response to intolerable circumstances following an unacceptable level of sectarianism related to football.
He added: "Tackling all forms of abusive behaviour, including abusive behaviour in and associated with football, is a priority for this Government. It is central to building an inclusive Scotland where all can live and raise their families in peace without the fear of threats, abuse or prejudice. The Act remains an important tool for helping us to achieve that goal."
The ministerial statement came after Alex Salmond hit out at critics of the legislation, describing sheriffs who had spoken out against it as "daft toffs" who thought "football was rugger with another name."
Labour's justice spokesman Hugh Henry responded to Mr Wheelhouse by saying it was impossible to determine whether any of the reductions in crime had been a result of the law, saying many could have been prosecuted under existing legislation, and accused the minister of being "disingenuous".
He added: "A promise was made to review the legislation. This work should be the start of that review. We all know that bigotry and intolerance are not confined to football matches but sadly infect too many corners of Scottish life.
"The Act has created a culture of mistrust between football fans and the authorities, whilst the research is welcome, it does not make clear whether or not the legislation is effective."
The chamber heard that in 84 per cent of charges under the Act in the most recent year, the victims of abuse had been Catholics. Protestants were the victims in 12 per cent of cases.
Labour left winger Neil Findlay accused the government of hypocrisy following the reaction to the Charlie Hebdo magazine murders in France. He said: "Politicians of all parties were declaring Je Suis Charlie in defence of freedom of speech. Yet, at the same time here, working class football fans are hauled before the courts for singing songs or wearing t-shirts that I and the minister may not like."
Scottish Conservative justice spokeswoman Margaret Mitchell said the time had come to repeal the legislation.
She added: "The minister's response to the review reaffirmed what we already knew about the attitudes to offensive behaviour at football matches, worse still is was an upbeat assessment of how this is working in practice, when everyone else can plainly see the problems with associated with this legislation.
"Today would have been ample timing to scrap these laws, but instead the minister seems to want to press on despite the widespread criticism it has attracted from sheriffs, legal experts and football fans."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article