CLAIMS have been made that security at Faslane will be weakened if there are further cuts to the service that provides guards for the nuclear submarine base.
Eamon Keating, Chairman of the Defence Police Federation, made the claim just weeks after William McNeilly, a Royal Navy submariner, raised concerns over Trident safety, saying the nuclear missile programme was a "disaster waiting to happen".
UK ministers are preparing to make further savings within the Ministry of Defence police force in its strategic defence and security review(SDSR).
Since 2010, the force has lost more than a third of its officers, who now number 2600.
Stressing how the MDP wishes to engage with the Government in a positive and constructive way, Mr Keating, nonetheless, will urge Ministers in a keynote speech to resist changes to security that "prioritise cost over threat".
He will warn: "The wrong decisions in the next six to 12 months will undermine officers, put the future of the MDP in jeopardy and, ultimately, reduce the security of the MoD's assets and personnel, not to mention the safety of the public."
At the federation's annual conference in Renfrew, the chairman will say there will only be two results of further cuts to the MDP's size and budget: MoD assets will be "less rather than more safe" and that, if it becomes necessary to increase security at a site, then the MoD "will be sorely lacking in resources".
Mr Keating will claim the MDP is operating at beyond its limits.
He will add: "The reality is that it would be impossible for the MDP to meet its current responsibilities if our numbers are reduced further."
He said this would be to the MoD's "detriment" as it would lose "security capabilities, presence in local communities" and among others, vital intelligence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article