A new national scriever is to champion the Scots language.
Some saw the new writing post - paid for from the public purse by arts agency Creative Scotland - as part of a nationalist agenda.
But does speaking Scots make you more likely to support independence? That is hard to measure.
But voting patterns in areas where Scots is most spoken actually suggest the reverse.
Here is a heat map of Scottish councils areas.
Those with the highest proportion of the population recorded as Scots speakers are darkest, and those with the lowest proportion, lightest.
There is a clear pattern: Scots is most widely spoken in the northern isles of Orkney and Shetland and in the north-east council areas of Aberdeenshire and Moray. Fully 49 per cent of Shetlanders and 48 per cent of Aberdeenshire residents told the 2011 census they knew Scots, compared with a national average of 30 per cent.
Come 2014 and support for independence in these areas proved to be far lower than knowledge of the language. Only 36 per cent of Shetlanders voted Yes, well below the national average of 45 per cent. In Orkney, according to the census, 40 per cent of residents say they speak Scots. Only 32 per cent of voters backed independence, the lowest figure in the country.
In fact, all four areas with the highest levels of Scots-speaking residents had below average support for independence. So what about the four areas of Scotland which voted Yes? Where did they rank on prevalence of the Scots language?
Here is a heat map of the results of last year's referendum, by council area. The darker the share, the higher the Yes vote.
Dundee was the most pro-independence place in the country last year, with a Yes vote of 57 per cent. However, only 31 per cent of Dundonians told the census they speak Scots. That is just below the national average of 30 per cent. But Dundee, in fact, ranks 17th out of the 32 councils on this measure, just below average.
The other three council areas that backed independence were Glasgow, North Lanarkshire and West Dunbartonshire. All three are firmly below average on Scots speakers. In Glasgow, the so-called Yes City, only 25 per cent of people said they had the language.
Several areas with very low level of Scots - such as East Renfrewshire, Edinburgh, Dumfries and Galloway and Scottish Borders - voted firmly No.
By the the way, the Western Isles - with the highest prevalence of Gaelic - has a very low figure for knowledge of Scots. Its support for independence was slightly above average at 47 per cent.
The Scots language - perhaps with its strong regional variations often underlining local rather than national identity - doesn't seem to correlate with support for independence.
But what about areas with high levels of Scottish identity reported in the census? Are they more likely to vote Yes?
This heat map shows council areas with the highest level of Scottish identity shared darkest, using figures, again, from the 2011 census.
The two darkest places here are the Yes strongholds of West Dunbartonshire and North Lanarkshire, where 72 per cent of respondents described their nationality as "Scottish only", compared with a national average of 62 per cent.
Inverclyde, which voted No by a whisker, ranked fourth in a league table of Scottish only national identity.
However, the Yes cities of Glasgow and Dundee did not record particularly high levels of Scottish-only identity in 2011 census.
Dundee was above average at 65 per cent.
Glasgow was at the national average of 62 per cent. So was Orkney, the place where support for independence was lowest of all.
Only in Edinburgh Scottish-only identity fall below half - at 49 per cent. Support for independence in the capital was the seventh lowest in the country, at just 39 per cent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article