RYANAIR boss Michael O'Leary has refused to give evidence in a German court case probing the budget airline's employment practices.
A German labour court in Wesel has cited the Ryanair chief executive to appear personally on July 1 in relation to the case brought by a former pilot, who has raised a complaint against the carrier's recruitment arrangements and its use of the London-based human resources firm, Brookfield Aviation International.
However, the Irish airline confirmed that Mr O'Leary would not attend the hearing.
A spokeswoman for Ryanair said: "Ryanair doesn't comment on individual employment cases. We can confirm that our CEO will not be in Germany on July 1 as these matters are routinely handled by Ryanair's Personnel Department and our lawyers."
The pilot says he flew with the airline as a self-employed contractor, an arrangement which enabled Ryanair to avoid normal social security obligations such as holiday pay and sick pay.
The relationship between Ryanair and Brookfield Aviation came under scrutiny in 2013 when the employment agency failed in its bid to sue members of the Irish Airline Pilots Association for not serving their full notice period.
The low-cost airline, which has a maintenance base at Prestwick Airport and also flies from Glasgow and Edinburgh Airports, hires the majority of its pilots through Brookfield Aviation.
The agency creates "mini-companies" and then appoints each pilot as a director. Pilots then hire out their services to Ryanair on a self-employed basis, rather than being directly employed by the airline.
These unusual arrangements were the subject of a recent study by the University of Ghent which found that, on average, one in six European pilots were now on "atypical" contracts, especially those employed by low-fares airlines.
Ryanair, Norwegian and Wizz Air were named among the worst offenders, but Ryanair has disputed the findings and criticised the methodology of the study which was based on an anonymous online survey of 6,600 pilots.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article