HIGH-PROFILE campaigns to encourage tactical voting in a bid to counter the SNP surge fell flat on Thursday, with numbers uniting behind unionist candidates proving woefully insufficient in preventing a nationalist landslide.
While it had been speculated that Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy could hang on to his East Renfrewshire seat on the back of votes lent from Conservatives, he ended up losing by a margin of almost 4,000.
The Conservative vote reduced by around 3,000 on 2010 levels, suggesting some Tories had been willing to back Mr Murphy, but not in nearly large enough numbers to prevent his defeat.
The Scottish Liberal Democrats, the party that had called most loudly and explicitly for tactical voting in the 11 seats it held, saw its key strategy backfire. Party strategists had insisted that the tactic could lead to it holding on to several seats. However, in the end just Alistair Carmichael retained, sneaking by in Orkney and Shetland with a vastly reduced majority of just 817.
The party had believed that tactical voting could lead to a victory in Gordon for Christine Jardine who was battling Alex Salmond. On the night, however, the former First Minister swept home with a majority of more than 8,000. The LibDem vote in the constituency increased by around 1,500 compared to 2010, however the vote for the SNP rose by around 17,000.
Some right wing newspapers had produced tactical voting guides in an attempt to prevent SNP victories while some voluntary groups sprung up and attempted to organise co-ordinated efforts among unionists.
Polling expert John Curtice, Professor of Politics University of Strathclyde, said that only one seat in Scotland - Edinburgh South which was retained by Labour's Ian Murray - could be seen as one in which tactical voting played a decisive factor.
He said: "It had about as much impact as we expected - not a lot. It's not impossible to believe that the Edinburgh South constituency was saved by tactical voting. In Dumfriesshire [where sole Scottish Tory MP David Mundell hung on] the LibDems did so badly that it's difficult to prove it was a decisive factor. In Orkney, we expected them to hold on.
"It was only ever possible that it would save a handful of seats, and was never going to stop a nationalist tsunami. When a party gets 50 per cent of the vote - and the SNP did - it's won. End of story."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article