AT times last year it seemed no meaningful television debates would take place before the election.
Since the end of March, however, we have seen have seen a whole series of programmes, each with a different format and line-up.
Four have been UK-wide: Sky and Channel 4 shared the "Battle for No 10" interviews, involving just David Cameron and Ed Miliband; ITV held a seven-way leaders' debate, and the BBC staged a "challengers' debate" followed by last week's Question Time special.
BBC Scotland screened the third and final debate to feature Scottish party leaders Nicola Sturgeon, Jim Murphy, Ruth Davidson and Willie Rennie.
Across all the debates, Ms Sturgeon has come out on top thanks to a string of polished performances which have sealed her emergence as a major UK politician. Ed Miliband has done well, while David Cameron has not suffered as badly as the Conservatives feared.
Would the final Scots debate change anything? Would it be an afterthought or might someone land a killer blow with only four days to polling day?
Presenter Glenn Campbell clearly feared an all-out rammy and made the four leaders promise in advance to conduct a "respectful debate".
His entreaty was respected for all of 15 minutes, until the question of welfare cuts was posed.
When Mr Murphy accused the Conservatives of docking claimants' benefits unfairly, Ms Davidson exploded, telling him: "That's an outright lie, it's a falsehood. He is making it up."
Mr Murphy hit back: "How dare you call me a liar."
Moments later, when Ms Sturgeon claimed Labour had backed cuts to disability benefits planned by the Conservatives, Mr Murphy retorted: "It's just not true."
Under pressure over her plans for full fiscal autonomy, which the IFS think tank has warned would blow a £7.6billion hole in Scotland's finances, Ms Sturgeon reached for the same familiar rebuttal.
"It's made up. This is a myth on the part of a rather desperate Labour Party," she protested.
In truth this was a tetchy debate between four candidates who all looked slightly too tired to be at their best.
If viewers did not switch off during the rancorous exchanges over welfare, they probably dozed off when the debate moved onto housing policy towards the end.
But those who watched the middle section of the show, broadcast from the splendid Mansfield Traquair in Edinburgh, saw some important clashes on the issue that is really exercising voters: what might happen after May 7 if there is a hung parliament.
Ms Sturgeon's threat to vote down a minority Labour government's budget, if she felt it failed to end cuts for the poorest, will set up three furious final days of campaigning.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article