AN AIRCRAFT engineer has been awarded almost £25,000 after winning his case for constructive dismissal against British Airways.
John Higgins, from High Blantyre, South Lanarkshire, was sacked after installing the wrong part on a plane at British Airways Maintenance Glasgow (BAMG) last March.
He claims he was under extreme pressure due to staffing problems, an excessive workload and unreasonable timescales and said the error "did not compromise the safe operation of the aircraft".
However, bosses at BA claimed that it did and sacked Mr Higgins before offering him a demoted post on appeal.
As the new post was three grades below his position as aircraft maintenance supervisor and attracted half the salary, the engineer rejected, leaving him to resign.
In a written judgment on the case, employment judge Susan Walker found that the sanction imposed by BA was "draconian" and "unjustified", She awarded Mr Higgins, who had an unblemished 27-year career with BA, £24,654.
Judge Walker said: "The Tribunal had little difficulty in concluding that demotion of three grades with the associated drop in pay and responsibility was likely to seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence between the parties.
"It would be humiliating for the claimant with his length of service and experience to go back to this relatively junior grade and have his supervisory responsibilities removed from him.
"The tribunal considered that BA did not have 'reasonable and proper cause' in all the circumstances, viewed objectively, for the sanction it imposed."
The tribunal was told that BAMG was seriously short-staffed on March 1 and 2 last year when Mr Higgins was overseeing work on an Airbus A321.
One of the contractors working under him damaged a wire and Mr Higgins repaired it with a splice which turned out to be the wrong one.
BA argued that the repair he carried out was important to the safety of the plane, but judge Walker found that manager Brian Queally had "overstated" the seriousness of the situation.
The plane also had two of these parts so if Mr Higgins' mistake had caused a safety breach, there was a back-up in place to deal with it.
Furthermore, the tribunal was told that the incident was not reported to the Civil Aviation Authority so, in line with safety guidelines, could not have been deemed to "endanger an aircraft, its occupants or any other person".
Mr Higgins tried to claim that he had been sacked for raising safety concerns over procedures at BA but that aspect of his case was thrown out. His award was also reduced by 50 per cent because he contributed to his dismissal.
A BA spokeswoman said: "We are pleased that the whistleblowing claims were not upheld, but we are disappointed with the outcome of the tribunal. We feel we acted fairly and properly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article