A MAN who suffered a suspected broken neck at a trampoline park is suing the operators for more than £100,000.
Chris McKenna was one of more than 100 people recorded as injured at Ryze in Dalkeith, Midlothian, within the first three weeks of its opening.
Lawyers for Mr McKenna are dealing with his complaint against the trampoline centre and the case could be lodged at the Court of Session before summer.
It is understood that around a dozen people who allege they suffered injuries at Ryze in January and February this year are pressing forward with personal injury claims.
It emerged on February 20 that Ryze staff had recorded 102 injuries to customers since it opened on January 23. It also came to light that the facility had been operating without a licence.
Mr McKenna, 49, said he suffered excruciating pain and heard his neck crack after falling badly on a trampoline at Ryze.
Following the accident, he was put in a neck brace, unable to work and facing a possible operation to insert a metal plate in his neck.
The self-employed father of one claims he was asked to move off the trampoline despite having a neck injury. Ryze categorically deny the allegation and claim they have CCTV footage which proves otherwise.
Mr McKenna's wife, Claire, 39, was eight months pregnant at the time of the accident. She said they would not be commenting but a source close to the case, who asked not to be identified, confirmed that Mr McKenna was pursuing a "six figure" sum.
Ryze has a large area of 60 connected trampolines and customers are allowed to bounce between them.
The facility re-opened to the public on Thursday after being closed for six weeks.
Midlothian Council has issued a licence to the facility with conditions limiting the maximum number of people on the trampoline to 125 at any one time. At least one trained first aider must be available at all times.
A spokesman for Digby Brown solicitors, which is representing some of those injured at the park, declined to comment on specific cases.
He said: "We've got around dozen cases we are investigating.
"We think the majority of these cases would be worth over £5,000 which would be heard at the Court of Session rather than the Sheriff Court.
"We've had injuries that are back and shoulder injuries, and ankles, right up to serious fractures and breaks.
"Some of them will be high four figures, high five figures in total. Some will be more like six figures."
He added: "We haven't evaluated all of the cases yet because we haven't had all of the medical evidence back."
A spokesman for Ryze said "We have yet to receive Mr McKenna's claim, but we will vigorously defend it.
"We have CCTV footage on the incident and this conflicts with Mr McKenna's version of events. It also shows that at no point did any member of staff attempt to move him.
"The overwhelming majority of customers have had a fun - and safe - experience.
"We are very clear at the point of admission that customers using our trampoline parks do so safely and responsibly, and are mindful of their own physical capabilities and limitations.
"All activity areas are supervised to ensure safe use, but jumpers also have a personal responsibility to follow our advice at all times."
A spokeswoman for Midlothian Council said: "Ryze Edinburgh had an application for an indoor sports licence which I can confirm has now been determined and the appropriate licence granted.
"In addition to the standard conditions that apply to all Civic Government Scotland licences, additional specific conditions have been imposed. Ryze has co-operated fully with the council."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article