AN aircraft engineer who quit after he was demoted to a mechanic has won his claim for unfair dismissal against British Airways.
John Higgins, from High Blantyre, South Lanarkshire, worked as an aircraft maintenance supervisor for the firm. He was dismissed after he installed the wrong part on a plane at British Airways Maintenance Glasgow a year ago.
He appealed against the dismissal as he had an unblemished career prior to the incident and BA had recorded the error as having little or no risk to the plane's airworthiness.
Although his appeal was successful, British Airways would only agree to reinstate him as a mechanic, a position several grades lower that would see him lose his status as a licensed aircraft engineer.
Mr Higgins, who worked for the firm for 27 years, resigned and pursued a claim against the company, which he has now won.
He said: "It is essential that any moves to undermine the status of the licensed aircraft engineer are opposed.
"I could not have done this without the support of the union's Association of Licensed Aircraft Engineers branch which has seen me through this very difficult time."
claims he made protected disclosures to BA and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) over who was allowed to sign off on work carried out on aircraft.
Claims that he was sacked after raising safety concerns over procedures at British Airways were thrown out by the tribunal.
A BA spokeswoman said: "We are pleased that the whistleblowing claims were not upheld, but we are disappointed with the outcome of the tribunal. We feel we acted fairly and properly throughout and await a full written decision. We will then decide if an appeal is appropriate."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article