INNOCENT people are having their telephone numbers collected and stored by Police Scotland after being frisked under controversial stop and search powers, the Sunday Herald can reveal.
A secret memo last year authorised the single force to record telephone numbers in their national search database - even when a frisk uncovered no criminality.
Highlands and Islands MSP John Finnie yesterday accused the force of being "creative with civil liberties".
Stop and search, which is chief constable Stephen House's signature crime-fighting policy, has become mired in controversy over the last twelve months.
The number of recorded searches in 2013/14, over 600,000, was proportionately far higher than in London and New York - and the tactic has even been used on toddlers and babies in Scotland.
Around three quarters of all searches in Scotland were "consensual", meaning the frisks are not rooted in law and not based on reasonable suspicion.
The volume of these non-statutory searches triggered an intervention from the First Minister and the practice is now expected to be abolished.
The Sunday Herald, however, has learned that Police Scotland has widened the types of information officers can now record after frisking individuals.
Until July last year, names and addresses were recorded, and whether a search found items such as drugs and blades.
A memo, sent by assistant chief constable Malcolm Graham, was meant to help a stop and search pilot in Fife geared around reforming many of the perceived flaws in the policy.
However, the guidance was sent to all division commanders around the country and the option of entering an individual's phone number became available to all officers nationwide.
Graham, the lead officer for Major Crime and Public Protection, wrote: "I would be grateful if the content of this memorandum could be brought to the attention of all staff and officers under your command."
The phone numbers, which are only taken if a citizen consents, include those people who have been searched on a suspicionless basis.
In England, where consensual searches were banned, personal details may only be required if a person is arrested.
A Police Scotland spokesperson initially told the Sunday Herald that phone numbers were only taken in the Fife pilot area.
The press office clarified by saying that the policy was "intended" to be for Fife, adding: "Numbers may have been recorded in other divisions if these were provided voluntarily by individuals stop searched. As the memo states the facility was set up on the National Stop Search IT application to support the 'P' Division Stop and Search pilot, where numbers were provided voluntarily, to check its effectiveness, improve transparency and seek feedback, but the recording of numbers was not mandatory."
Professor Alan Miller, the chair of the Scottish Human Rights Commission, said: "The Commission has some concerns about whether people who have been stopped and searched by the police are in a position to give informed consent to a request to provide their phone number.
"A better alternative would be to provide them with a way of getting in touch with Police Scotland, should they wish to do so. We repeat our call for the practice of non-statutory stop and search to be brought to an end immediately given that it lacks a legal framework."
Finnie said: "Unless the law has changed, and I am not aware it has, there's no obligation to give the police details of your phone.
"It is time for the law-enforcers to cease being creative with civil liberties and restrict their stop and search practices to the tried, tested and lawful ones in operation prior to the creation of target-fixated Police Scotland.
"The Parliament's Police Committee will shortly revisit the stop and search issue and this further intrusion into a citizens' privacy will certainly feature."
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesperson Alison McInnes said: "Police Scotland needs to explain to what extent it has been recording the telephone numbers of those it has stopped and searched.
"Have the telephone numbers collected outwith Fife been used for any purpose? Does the national force intend for the collection of phone numbers to become standard practice or will this option be scrapped once the Fife pilot has concluded?
"Time and again it has been demonstrated that there are insufficient safeguards around the use of this controversial tactic."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article