NICK Clegg has rallied to the defence of Liberal Democrat cabinet colleague Danny Alexander over the donations row, sparked by a newspaper sting, insisting the Highland MP has done absolutely nothing wrong.
But the SNP, which is hoping to unseat the Chief Secretary to the Treasury in Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey, called for full disclosure in what it branded a "dodgy donation scandal".
Claims that a party fundraiser sought to bypass donation laws will cast something of a shadow over the Liberal Democrats three-day spring conference in Liverpool, which begins today.
The Deputy Prime Minister said any inference that Mr Alexander, who met a fake Indian entrepreneur and would-be donor in the undercover operation, had done anything wrong was "categorically untrue".
Mr Clegg insisted a recording supposedly revealing the Scot talking to the bogus businessman simply showed him being a "polite guy".
Mr Alexander, when told the fake entrepreneur had offered a donation of £7650 and had promised a further gift of up to £100,000, reportedly told him: "I just want you to know that I, personally, am very, very grateful for what you are doing and for what you are offering to do". He added: "I won't intrude on the details but, genuinely, it will make a difference."
It was claimed the bogus businessman was also introduced to figures such as Lord Ashdown, taken to Mr Clegg's office and attended a dinner for major party benefactors, where he met Mr Alexander.
The fund-raiser at the centre of the row, Ibrahim Taguri, has stepped down as the party candidate in Brent Central but will contest the Lib Dem seat as an independent.
It is alleged he told the bogus businessman that he could channel donations via family members and backdate cheques to avoid appearing on public registers. He was also said to have promised big donations could "open doors"
Official guidance, issued in 2007 in the wake of a scandal of "proxy" donations to Labour, says giving money via a third party "must not be used as an attempt to evade the controls on permissibility and transparency".
Lord Ashdown, the Lib Dems' General Election campaign chief, also insisted Mr Alexander had done nothing wrong but acknowledged Mr Taguri had "serious questions to answer".
The former party leader said the claim of trying to circumvent donations law was a "serious allegation and we are treating it very seriously" but he insisted the party had done "nothing illegal or improper".
Mr Taguri, who has stepped down as the Lib Dems' race equality champion, denied any wrongdoing and said he was "confident that I will be exonerated of all the claims made against me".
He confirmed he intended to fight the election as an independent but said he hoped to return to the party fold after clearing his name.
On his weekly radio phone-in, Mr Clegg said the undercover recording showed "Danny being a polite guy, just saying thank you to someone who he has been told is supporting the party".
The Lib Dem leader went on: "The idea that Danny or any parliamentarian has done anything wrong is categorically untrue.
"On the issue of Ibrahim Taguri, no cheque has been received by the Liberal Democrats, no cheque has been cashed. If we had received this cheque in question, of course it would have been scrutinised and checked."
But the SNP seized on the matter with Drew Hendry, its candidate seeking to unseat Mr Alexander, saying: "This latest episode is an extremely serious issue, apparently involving the Lib Dems at a very senior level seeking to break electoral law."
He went on: "Danny Alexander is at the centre of this dodgy donation scandal and he must provide an immediate and full account of his role in it. The people of Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey deserve full disclosure from Mr Alexander about this murky matter."
Mr Hendry added: "It seems the Lib Dems are becoming increasingly desperate to get their hands on cash regardless of where it is from."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article