A PUBLIC consultation has been launched on Scotland's only surviving travellers' monument to help establish whether it should be declared a site of national significance.
The Historic Scotland consultation forms part of a wider review on the Tinkers' Heart monument in Argyll, which was used by travellers for weddings and baptisms in years gone by.
The move comes after thousands of people signed up to a petition calling for the site, which features a heart of quartz stones, to be scheduled by the public body and preserved to offer travellers a place to visit to remember their heritage.
Historic Scotland is now urging travellers and people in the local community to come forward and tell their stories of the site.
SNP MSP for Argyll and Bute, Michael Russell, who has backed the petition and campaign from the start, has welcomed the public body's decision.
He said: "I'm really pleased that they're doing this.
"This is the only thing of its kind in Scotland, there's no other monument to the travelling people in Scotland, and it's in a terrible state.
"Every time I go past it I'm reminded how bad it is. It really needs to be scheduled and preserved and protected."
He added: "The consultation is the next big step and I'm delighted Historic Scotland has been flexible enough to do it.
"I'd encourage people to get in touch with their stories about the monument and be positive about it and hopefully Historic Scotland will decide to schedule the site."
The monument, which sits on the road between Cairndow and Strachur, overlooking Loch Fyne, is said to be a sacred monument for travellers which traces its history back to the Battle of Culloden.
However, Historic Scotland claim there is very little documented evidence of Tinkers' Heart because the travelling community is more inclined to pass down stories and traditions orally.
Dr George Findlater, who is leading the consultation, said: "We are really keen to hear about any information people may have - no matter how trivial it may seem - regarding the Tinkers' Heart.
"This is a great opportunity for those with knowledge of its history to help us better understand its cultural significance."
"The petitioners have already demonstrated the weight of feeling surrounding this particular monument, which is why we have chosen to look again at our previous decision.
"We hope that by asking for the public to share their knowledge about this fascinating monument we can better understand its significance."
He added: "Ultimately what we are trying to do is to improve our understanding on this important, yet sometimes neglected area of Scottish History."
The consultation will run for 12 weeks, closing on May 15, and members of the public are being asked to contribute their stories, songs, photographs and any other information they may have about the site.
Historic Scotland will also write to academics to ask for their input on the subject.
The information will then be analysed and used to help assessors determine whether Tinkers' Heart should be added to the list of monuments of national importance, which is maintained by Historic Scotland on behalf of Scottish Ministers.
This would make it a criminal offence to carry out any unauthorised work on the site.
Traveller and author Jess Smith, who launched the petition, claimed the consultation is a step in the right direction.
She said: "There's been a lot of publicity around this, a lot of Scottish voices saying this place needs to be protected, and now it looks as if they've opened a wee door and we might be able to get somewhere now.
"The Heart is a very important piece of our history, it's where our ancestors went to get married, to have their babies Christened, and we need to protect it."
Ms Smith added that she hoped many travellers take part in the consultation and share their stories about what the monument means to them and what it meant to their ancestors.
Further information on the consultation can be found on the Historic Scotland website at www.historic-scotland.gov.uk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article