THE mother of a boy who killed his foster carer contacted him via Facebook just days before he stabbed the woman to death, a fatal accident inquiry has heard.
The boy's allocated social worker Stephen Lorimer said he still did not know what had been discussed during the conversation through the social media site, which was unauthorised as all contact with the boy's family was meant to be supervised.
However family members had previously scapegoated the teenager for the family's problems, he said.
The boy, then 13, had been in the placement for six and a half months when he attacked his foster mother Dawn McKenzie with a knife.
Mr Lorimer, who is employed by Glasgow City Council, told the inquiry in Motherwell that the move for the boy to stay with foster carers Dawn and Bryan McKenzie had been last-minute and not good practice, as social workers been unable to meet with the Hamilton couple, or undertake matching procedures to ensure they were a good fit with the troubled boy.
However the placement had been working well and was a lower priority than other cases on his books.
Mr Lorimer said that the incident with Facebook was the first occasion on which he had had any indication that Mrs McKenzie was struggling to look after the Glasgow boy, who had been in care since 2008.
He said the boy's mother and father had previously attempted to disrupt foster placements and on one occasion his mother had turned up at the school his sister attended and attempted to persuade her to leave with her by jumping the school gates.
Of the incident when the boy revealed his mother had been in touch via Facebook, he said: "To this day I don't know what she said to him."
Mrs McKenzie confiscated the boy's laptop as a temporary measure to prevent further contact. "That was the first real indication I got from Mrs McKenzie that she in any shape or form struggled with the care of [the boy]" he said. Although removing the computer was designed to protect not punish him, Mr Lorimer said the boy "would possibly see it as a punishment".
The incident happened on June 15, 2011, nine days before the fatal attack on Mrs McKenzie, for which the boy was detained for seven years at the High Court in Glasgow in 2012.
The FAI in Motherwell heard from Mr Lorimer that the placement with the McKenzies had not been arranged until days before a previous foster placement ended.
As the allocated worker, Mr Lorimer would have expected to have contributed to the choice of new carers. He would also have expected to have had meetings with the McKenzies and meet with Foster Care Associates, who provided the placement, he said. None of this had happened by the time the boy was placed with the couple, on November 28, 2010.
Under council policy Mr Lorimer should then have visited the McKenzies within seven days. In fact he did not even meet Dawn McKenzie until seven weeks later at a children's hearing and no formal visit took place until January 28, a further fortnight later.
He said he should have had more contact with the family, and he was "not making excuses", but other commitments had got in the way, including other child protection cases. He said bad weather had also prevented one visit, then he had been abroad on leave over Christmas, before another visit was called off because the boy was ill.
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article