Pregnant women who smoke are more likely to quit if they are offered shopping vouchers, according to a study.
Researchers studied 612 women over 16 and less than 24 weeks' pregnant to assess whether financial incentives would help them quit the habit.
The study, published in the British Medical Journal, suggested up to 5,000 miscarriages a year could be attributed to smoking during pregnancy, along with hundreds of stillbirths and infant deaths.
Academics estimated the annual cost to the NHS was up to £64m for treating smoking-related problems in mothers and up to £23.5m for the babies up to 12 months old, meaning financial incentives were "potentially cost effective".
Split into two random groups, one set was offered normal stop-smoking services provided by the NHS, while the other group was given the same support and up to £400 in online shopping vouchers for stopping during their pregnancy.
Those in the latter group who agreed to a face-to-face appointment and set a date by which to quit were given an initial £50 voucher before being given further vouchers of £50, £100 and £200 if they managed to abstain from smoking for up to 38 weeks after the set date. Those who said they had quit were tested by a nurse and rewarded only if they were proved to have stopped.
Overall, 23% of smokers offered the vouchers had stopped smoking compared with 9% of others.
But, while the researchers acknowledged there could be ethical issues with offering financial incentives, they said they could prevent smoking-related conditions in mothers and babies and reduce infant mortality.
The report's authors at Glasgow University and the University of Stirling, concluded: "Smoking in pregnancy remains a leading preventable cause of maternal and neonatal ill health and death in the United Kingdom and in most other developed countries.
"Existing interventions are not highly effective. This study provides substantial evidence of a promising and potentially cost effective new intervention to add to present health service support. The findings can serve as the basis for future research to include other UK centres and other healthcare systems."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article