THE Scottish Government ended last year with a record underspend, despite repeated complaints from the SNP administration about Westminster austerity cuts squeezing its budget.
Ministers underspent by almost half a billion pounds in 2013-14, according to a final out-turn report lodged at Holyrood the day after MSPs left for the Christmas recess.
The government had £444 million left over from its £34.5bn budget last year, or 1.3 per cent of the total, the first time an underspend has exceeded £350m since the SNP came to power in 2007.
The underspend is usually less than one per cent.
Although the £444m will still be available for use this year, a large underspend is often seen as undesirable, as it means public services missed out unnecessarily on better funding.
The biggest factors in the last financial year were a £165m underspend in the £3bn education and lifelong learning portfolio, or 5.5 per cent of the budget, and a £102m, or four per cent, underspend in the £2.6bn infrastructure portfolio, then being overseen by Nicola Sturgeon.
The justice portfolio was underspent by £92m, or 3.6 per cent of its £2.5bn budget - at a time when sheriff courts were being close to save money.
Tory finance spokesman Gavin Brown MSP said it was rich for the SNP to complain about cuts while sitting on funds of nearly half a billion.
He said: "Last year, they moaned in every speech about not having enough money and how austerity was holding them back, yet they didn't spend what they had.
"No wonder this report was released at the quietest time of the year."
Although elements of the underspend were previously reported in assorted government accounts, it was not until they were brought together in December's report that the full total was made explicit.
A Government spokesman said: "This report contains no new information.
"It simply brings together budget and out-turn information already laid before the Scottish Parliament and published in the audited accounts of the bodies that make-up the Scottish Administration.
"The report records an overall underspend of less than 1.3 per cent."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article