MINISTERS have been accused of abandoning policies to protect teacher numbers and reduce class sizes.
Teachers' leaders issued the warning after figures showed nearly half of councils cut teachers last year leading to a rise in pupil-teacher ratios.
The Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union said the financial settlement, published late last year, made no mention of future funding of these previously key policies.
Larry Flanagan, the EIS general secretary, has now written to John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister, to raise the union's concerns over the terms of the local authority budget settlement.
He said: "The settlement, which seemed to grant local authorities license to attack teacher numbers and increase class sizes, suggests that the Scottish Government is willing to abandon key commitments to Scotland's pupils, parents and teachers.
"This comes despite its earlier protestations about accepting the importance of maintaining teacher numbers to ensure a sound learning environment and high-quality educational experience for pupils.
"We have already seen class sizes increase across Scotland even with guarantees on teacher numbers in place. Now, with the potential removal of these protections, councils would be able to cut back still further on teaching staff numbers with damaging consequences for young people in our classrooms."
In December, The Herald revealed the councils that reduced teacher numbers despite a supposedly binding agreement with the Scottish Government.
The largest fall was in Fife, where 67 teaching posts were lost, followed by Edinburgh with a cut of 63 teachers. There were also reductions in the Scottish Borders, Dundee, South Lanarkshire and East Renfrewshire.
Overall the number of teachers across Scotland has fallen by more than 250 to 50,824 in 2014 compared to the previous year.
Under the terms of the agreement between the Scottish Government and local authority umbrella body Cosla councils who missed their targets should have faced financial penalties, estimated at around £10 million.
However, ministers have so far refused to impose the sanctions pending discussions on how local authorities are to be judged on educational performance in future.
Mr Flanagan added: "The Scottish Government and Cosla can talk all they like about working to agree a new set of measures based on educational outcomes, but the fact of the matter is you cannot deliver outcomes without sufficient input - and that means investment to ensure there are sufficient numbers of teachers working with pupils in the classroom."
Douglas Chapman, education spokesman for Cosla, said local government was "completely focused" on tackling the attainment gap between rich and poor.
He said: "This gap has been present over the years and was just as stark at times when we had more teachers than we currently do.
"Cosla has been consistent in arguing we need to focus on the impact of education on all our young people and not statistics that mask the deep-seated relationship between poverty, disadvantage and poor attainment.
"There is not a council in the land that would want to reduce the number of teachers in schools if it could be avoided and the most recent statistics show where school rolls in primary are increasing so too is the number of teachers."
Mr Chapman said the overall increase in pupil-teacher ratios was "unavoidable" given the financial pressures faced by all local authorities.
A Scottish Government spokesman said ministers and councils had made a shared a commitment to maintain teacher numbers in line with pupil numbers for this financial year.
He said: "Discussions are underway with Cosla, local authorities, teaching unions, parent bodies and others on the best way to measure a broader range of educational outcomes, including teacher numbers as an important factor in the future. If these discussions do not reach a satisfactory agreement the existing commitment and financial agreements will remain in place.
"Our priority continues to be to maintain teacher numbers in line with pupil numbers, but we recognise that the UK Government's policy of financial austerity places Scottish Government and local government in a difficult position.
"In that context it is important that we both work together for children and young people and we will be engaging with Cosla, trade unions and parent bodies to reach agreement on how we best support teachers and teaching."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article