THE SNP leadership has for the first time acknowledged that it could form a new UK Coalition with Labour in a bid to keep the Tories out of power, should the electoral arithmetic present the opportunity after next May's General Election.
With polls continuing to suggest a surge in Nationalist support at the next election with the party's number of MPs, currently just six, rising substantially, pundits are increasingly considering the possibilities of not only the SNP propping up a minority Labour administration but also of it forming a new Coalition with Ed Miliband's party.
Stewart Hosie, the Nationalists' deputy leader, said that if the SNP could stop the prospect of a Tory government bent on imposing more austerity on Britain "through whatever mechanism" and help a minority Labour administration, then it would want to ensure the right policies were pursued "for everyone across the whole of the UK".
Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader, has balked at the prospect of Alex Salmond becoming a UK Government Minister, saying "he could hold England to ransom".
But Mr Hosie pointed out how there was just one Tory MP in Scotland yet the nation's economy was run by the Conservative Chancellor George Osborne, saying: "I don't think it's right for people to whinge if, on a UKwide basis, we help form part of a government."
Asked if it would be right for the SNP to put Labour in power if the Tories had a majority south of the border, the Dundee MP replied: "Unionists can't have it both ways; that's the bottom line.
"They can't argue this is the Union, this is a family of nations and all the other stuff they say, and then start whingeing and whining when people from Scotland form part of a majority government. That just wouldn't do at all, would it?"
When it was pointed out how people in England and Wales might resent big decisions such as on Trident being made by a separatist party, the SNP's Treasury spokesman pointed out how the majority opinion in Scotland was against nuclear weapons being "parked 30 miles from our largest city".
Mr Hosie went on: "If we're in a position of such strength that we could scrap Trident and its replacement, saving £100bn the UK can't afford and making Scotland and, indeed, the whole of the UK less of a target, then it would be a good thing to do. It's a principled position we've held for a very long time as have many others, to be fair; that's a perfectly legitimate political decision to take."
On other issues, the SNP's deputy leader said that the Scottish Government had not sought to stir up resentment in England but introduce good policies for Scotland.
"Free education is a good thing; full stop. I'd love to see it in England if only the Labour Party could be progressive. We don't do good things in Scotland to stir up resentment...(but)because they are popular and necessary. I only wish there was a political party that represented the English people, who took the same view."
Meantime, the SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon welcomed new polling, which suggested the SNP holding the balance of power in a hung Westminster parliament with a minority Labour government was the most popular General Election outcome among Scots.
"With a strong group of SNP MPs holding the balance of power at Westminster, we can ensure that Scotland's voice is heard and use our influence positively to end austerity economics, free Scotland of Trident nuclear weapons, and secure the powers we need to build a fairer, more prosperous country," said the First Minister.
* David Steel, the former Liberal Party leader, has predicted a "kaleidoscope parliament" after the General Election with no party having an overall majority. "The Lib Dems and the SNP between them are more likely to hold the balance of power," he suggested.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article