SCOTTISH Labour deputy leadership candidate Katy Clark has claimed the party faces certain defeat at the hands of the SNP unless she is elected to the key role.
The North Ayrshire and Arran MP issued a press statement yesterday backing a letter sent to MSPs by two prospective Labour candidates warning the party was heading for "surefire electoral defeat" unless they backed her in the contest.
In the letter, Lesley Brennan and Carol Mohan claim voters will be "uninterested" in Labour in next May's general election and the Holyrood poll of 2016 unless the party changes.
In a scathing assessment they write: "The referendum and the subsequent debate has been an exciting time to be involved in politics in Scotland.
"Unfortunately, it's not been our party that's excited people.
"The SNP is not a progressive party but we've lost a lot of our progressive vote - our core vote - to them because people simply don't trust Labour anymore."
They add: "If we are to have a hope of winning next year we need to change and we need to show people we've listened to their anger.
"We can't go to the electorate with more business as usual.
"It doesn't matter how good a campaigner or public speaker you are, if we don't have the right values and policies as well to convince the electorate again, we will lose and so will dozens of candidates across the country."
Under Labour's electoral college system, MPs, MSPs and MEPs account for a third of the total vote.
Left-winger Ms Clark is standing against MSP Kezia Dugdale.
The results of the leadership and deputy leadership ballots will be announced on December 13.
A Lib Dem MSP said: "It's an interesting way to promote your party."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article