POLICE are continuing to quiz Scottish Tory Party leader Ruth Davidson in connection with allegations pro-Union campaigners illegally counted postal votes in the weeks before independence referendum ballots closed.
Ms Davidson was interviewed by police in her Parliament offices last month, six days after Police Scotland was instructed by the Crown Office to carry out an investigation into alleged electoral secrecy law breaches.
Now it has emerged police have sought further clarity on what she told them in an exchange of emails. Party sources say the exchange, like the interview, was conducted on the basis of her being a witness and that Ms Davidson is not the subject of the investigation.
Police, who began assessing complaints two months ago, will only say the investigation is continuing. The formal police investigation was sparked after the Scottish Tory leader said on a televised discussion that postal vote "tallies" were being taken in the weeks before the referendum ballot closed at 10pm on September 18. Complaints over Ms Davidson's account of the postal vote "tallies" raised concerns the information may have helped inform the No campaign's decision to issue the "vow" of more powers for Scotland from the three main party leaders. Mary Pitcaithly, who is convener of the Electoral Management Board for Scotland, the official referendum scrutineer, has admitted for the first time that a "small number" made her aware of concerns the postal vote may have been compromised in the light of Ms Davidson's comments.
She says they were advised to raise any such concerns with their local counting officer who would be able to explain the steps taken to make everyone attending the opening sessions aware of the requirements for secrecy. "Anyone who called was also made aware that the matter had been referred to Police Scotland since only they could investigate any alleged breach of the criminal law.
"They were also made aware that they could themselves take any complaint or evidence to the police," she said.
"The behaviour of people entitled to attend postal vote opening sessions is a matter for the local COs in each area who will report any alleged breaches to the police. The CCO has no role in this but does issue guidance on the matter." A matter of days before details of the police assessment of complaints emerged Ms Pitcaithly announced that all counts "were properly conducted and scrutinised by thousands of people representing both the Yes Scotland and the Better Together campaigns, as well as international election observers, media and police."
She said then that nobody had raised any concerns during the verification, counting and adjudication stages.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article