PUBLIC money is potentially being "squandered" on university students who graduate without the skills required for work, a former college boss has warned.
Sue Pinder OBE, who stepped down in 2012 as principal of James Watt College in Greenock, said colleges were better placed than higher education institutions to produce students with the skills required by the economy.
Her comments, contained in a new book of ideas to improve the education system compiled by the Scottish Conservatives, come at a time when the further education sector has been hit by significant cuts.
While universities have seen funding largely protected at a time of austerity in public finances, a recent parliamentary briefing for MSPs showed colleges would see a £67 million real-terms cut between 2011/12 and 2015/16.
Ms Pinder said: "Scotland's universities consistently appear in the world top rankings, but there is a lingering concern about the fit between the knowledge and skill sets of graduates and skills gaps in the economy. Questions need to be answered about the potential squandering of public resources on graduates who cannot find work and are not work ready when they graduate.
"The college sector is the most critical for the economy. Colleges are all about vocational skills and workforce development; it is the college sector that is crucial to a vibrant and enterprising economy."
Ms Pinder went on to attack the Scottish Government's "radical regionalisation" agenda, which began in 2010/11. "What started out as a series of draconian spending cuts, some £50m per annum, soon evolved into a direct attack on the governance, performance, leadership and management of the colleges," she said.
Alastair Sim, director of Universities Scotland, which represents university principals, said: "There is a risk, and one universities very much want to avoid, that Scotland's university and college sectors are pitted against each other to argue over which offers the most value."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article