EIGHT Better Together figures are supporting Jim Murphy's leadership bid, deepening suspicions that the pro-UK body "shamelessly" promoted the MP during the referendum.
Campaign director Blair McDougall, chairman Alistair Darling and several members of the group's spin machine are trying to help install Murphy as Johann Lamont's successor.
The venue hosting Murphy's campaign launch in Edinburgh also stated that the client for yesterday's event was Better Together.
In June, the Sunday Herald revealed how party powerbrokers wanted Murphy to replace Lamont as leader. Lamont's allies grew to believe Better Together was deliberately giving Murphy as much exposure as possible.
McDougall, who was the most senior staffer at Better Together, has now been enlisted as an adviser to the East Renfrewshire MP.
Rob Shorthouse, who was the group's director of communications, also provided support on a temporary basis by getting Murphy's campaign up and running.
Kate Watson, who is still employed by the campaign group, helped organise yesterday's launch at the Royal College of Surgeons. The venue named Watson as the contact for the event and Better Together as the client.
A source close to Lamont said: "They deserve to be at the launch. They have been working on this for the last six months."
An SNP spokesperson said: "After the weeks of plotting against Johann Lamont that forced her out of office, it is no surprise that there is clearly a great deal of continued ill-feeling towards those who brought her down. This ongoing political manoeuvring simply confirms that people in Labour remain far more interested in jockeying for position than meeting the aspirations of people in Scotland."
A spokesman for Murphy's campaign declined to comment on suggestions Better Together had been promoting the MP during the referendum.
He added: "The guy at the venue knew Kate from Better Together and assumed it was another Better Together event. The client is Jim's campaign and the invoice is to Jim's campaign."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article