POLICE have charged 32 people with 37 alleged offences, including serious assault and carrying an offensive weapon, in connection with loyalist violence the day after the independence referendum.
Chief Constable Sir Stephen House praised officers for containing a stand-off between groups of Yes and No supporters in Glasgow's George Square on September 19.
Hundreds of police, including mounted officers, were mobilised to try to keep pro-independence voters and passers-by safe from a group of unionist extremists celebrating the No victory.
Sir Stephen described the events to his main civilian oversight board, the Scottish Police Authority, yesterday. He said: "Yes had campaigners gathered in the square - and I would stress there was no trouble with that. However, later on a group of people who arrived who you may wish to characterise as No campaigners.
"They began to taunt the Yes campaigners. It was a pretty tense situation."
Some loyalists were waving Better Together and Labour Party placards but were not thought to be part of the official campaign.
Police throughout the referendum campaign are understood to have been braced for trouble from violent loyalists with links to football hooliganism, the far right and Northern Irish politics.
However, officers did not expect this to represent anything other than a tiny minority - and the Scottish Police Federation criticised the "exaggerated rhetoric" of those who talked up trouble.
Its president, Brian Docherty, said: "Any neutral observer could be led to believe Scotland is on the verge of societal disintegration, yet nothing could be further from the truth."
Sir Stephen said: "This was a somewhat unsavoury part of the generally extremely well-behaved referendum.
"It was a difficult event, especially as it was played out on social media."
The chief constable praised the courage of his officers, who were backed by British Transport Police.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article