SOUTH African prosecutors have said they will file appeal papers in the next few days against the verdict and sentencing in the case of Oscar Pistorius, who was given a five-year prison term after being convicted of culpable homicide for killing his girlfriend.
The National Prosecuting Authority's decision to appeal could see the Olympic runner face a murder charge again for shooting Reeva Steenkamp, and a minimum of 15 years in prison if he is found guilty on appeal.
Pistorius, the 27-year-old double-amputee athlete, was acquitted of murder by Judge Thokozile Masipa last month for shooting Ms Steenkamp multiple times through a toilet door in his home in Pretoria. He said he mistook her for a night-time intruder. Judge Masipa found him guilty instead on a charge comparable to manslaughter.
The NPA said in a statement its decision to appeal was based on a "question of law", meaning it believes that Judge Masipa misapplied the law when she acquitted Pistorius of murder.
"The merits and the demerits of the NPA's argument ... will become evident when we file papers for leave to appeal," the NPA, South Africa's national prosecuting body, said. "The prosecutors are now preparing the necessary papers in order to be able to file within the next few days."
Prosecutors have to apply initially to Judge Masipa for permission to appeal within 14 days of Pistorius's October 21 sentencing.
Pistorius's lawyer, Brian Webber, declined to comment.
Pistorius started serving his prison sentence last week. He is eligible for release after 10 months and would then complete the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article