The UK blew a chance to create a major new player in the banking industry because a black-hole in the Co-op Bank's finances was not spotted by regulators and its auditor until it was too late, MPs said yesterday.
A report by the Treasury Select Committee is critical of the work of KPMG and said problems at the mutual should have been identified long before the Co-op's ill-fated £750 million bid to buy 632 branches from Lloyds Banking Group.
But MPs said they found no evidence that politicians swayed the 2012 decision by Lloyds to choose the Co-op over rival bidder NBNK Investments.
The takeover collapsed after a huge shortfall of £1.5 billion was discovered in the mutual's balance sheet, causing Lloyds to trigger a fall-back option of a stock market listing under the TSB brand.
Committee chairman Andrew Tyrie said: "Each of the backstops - Co-op Bank itself, KPMG as its auditor, and the FSA as its regulator - failed to uncover the bank's capital shortfall until it was too late.
"Each had a hand in this sorry tale. But by far the biggest responsibility lies with the Co-op Bank leadership."
Mr Tyrie said the divestment should have been an opportunity to establish a significant new challenger in UK retail banking but that this opportunity was lost because of the late discovery of the Co-op Bank's problems.
TSB's market share of 4.2% raised questions about whether the new entity was large enough to act as a significant challenger in the market, he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article