MINISTERS have come under fire over their decision to award the £6 billion ScotRail franchise to Abellio, part of the Netherlands' state-run rail service.
Trade unions and opposition MSPs voiced anger the tendering process was not delayed in order to allow a Scottish public sector bid to come forward.
In a second blow to their hopes yesterday, Transport Minister Keith Brown played down calls to invoke a "break clause" midway through the new 10-year contract to consider an alternative.
Abellio will replace Aberdeen-based FirstGroup on April 1 next year and has promised a number of improvements to services.
But rail unions RMT, TSSA and Aslef, along with Scottish Labour, the Greens and Scottish Socialists, condemned the decision, claiming it had dashed hopes of taking Scotland's railways back into public hands.
The Scottish Government is expected to gain new powers allowing it to consider a public-sector rail bid as part of the devolution package being considered by Lord Smith of Kelvin's commission.
Labour's transport spokesman, James Kelly, said: "In public the SNP talk about more powers, but when faced with the opportunity to use them in the interests of Scotland they bottle it."
Mr Brown said the railways could have ground to a halt had he delayed a decision on who should be awarded the franchise.
He was later pressed by Labour and Green MSPs to use a get-out clause in the new franchise, but told them: "Who can say in five years' time what the situation is, but you have to go into these contracts with the intention of seeing through the contracts."
The announcement was welcomed by the Tories. MSP Alex Johnstone said: "The transport minister has done well to resist calls from sirens of the extreme left who would see us return to the investment vacuum and the catastrophic management failures of state-owned monopolies of the 1970s."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article