CONCERNS have been raised that a proposal to have issues such as abortion and homosexuality enshrined in the school curriculum will be used to indoctrinate children with sexual ethics that their parents may object to.
The Scottish Parliament has taken forward a petition by sex education lobbyist Sexpression: UK calling on MSPs to take the almost unprecedented step of using the law to compel schools to provide sex and relationship education (SRE).
Discussions about domestic violence, rape, assault and child abuse should be compulsory from a young age, Sexpression: UK spokeswoman Rebecca Ryce told Holyrood's Public Petitions Committee.
Children could be asked to imagine the difficulties they would face if they brought home a same-sex partner or discuss whether abortion is appropriate, she added.
But Rev David Robertson, of the Free Church of Scotland, said such a regime would be "an absolute breach of human rights for children to be 'educated' in a particular sexual philosophy, which is contrary to the wishes of their parents and ultimately harmful to the child".
He added: "On the surface Sexpression's concerns seem justified and their solutions reasonable. However, in reality it is a Trojan horse which will be used to indoctrinate our children into the particular sexual ethics and philosophy which Sexpression regard as right."
Conservative MSP Jackson Carlaw also raised concerns, fearing that a child who objected to the statutory "received wisdom" would be told they are wrong.
Mr Carlaw said: "I would worry that there was a received wisdom as to what was correct and that anyone who perhaps took an alternative view would be told they are wrong, when in fact that is a subjective argument and not, in fact, an absolute one."
The committee agreed to take forward the petition and seek further advice from the Scottish Government health and education departments and look at international best practice on SRE.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article