LEGAL experts have raised concern over the large number of companies that fail to pay employment tribunal awards, leaving thousands of workers out of pocket.
Figures show almost half the successful claimants in Scotland never get a penny, with a further 13 per cent receiving just part of what they are owed.
The UK Parliament is currently considering a Bill introducing a penalty for employers who fail to pay, but the Law Society of Scotland has called for a full review of the system, including looking at ways to boost payment rates.
Citizens Advice Scotland (CAS) is also concerned. Its advisers regularly hear from workers who have gone through a lengthy, stressful tribunal process but get nothing.
Currently, if a company does not pay, the onus is on the claimant to pursue payment through a sheriff's officer - which can cost hundreds of pounds and may still result in them getting nothing.
Andrew Alexander, who deals with access to justice for the Law Society of Scotland, explained that Scots firms are worst when it comes to non-payment, with a bigger percentage of awards going unpaid north of the Border than in England and Wales.
He said: "We think it would be worth exploring a variety of measures to help ensure that awards are paid to successful claimants as part of a review."
He said Government research showed that, in Scotland, 46 per cent of awards went unpaid compared to 34 per cent which are not paid in England and Wales, where there is a fast-track system in place in the county courts to help enforce payment.
"It would certainly be worth examining how to increase the percentage of payments which are due to claimants. A full review of the system is essential to ensure access to justice."
The calls for change come as it was revealed a Sikh garage worker who was racially abused by his Muslim bosses has received none of the £18,000 awarded to him.
Bosses at the firm involved, PK Imperial Ltd, who operate a petrol station in Greenock, are now trying to liquidate the company and recently changed its director.
Solicitor Brian McLaughlin, acting for the claimant, Paramjit Singh, said the chances of his client getting his award are now negligible.
Susan McPhee, head of policy for CAS, said: "Scottish [Citizens Advice] advisers have seen a number of people who are seeking advice because they haven't received the award an employment tribunal has ruled they're entitled to.
"Sadly, it's easy for companies to avoid paying workers what they owe by simply transferring their assets to a new 'phoenix' company and winding up the old one. It's clearly an access to justice issue when the onus is on individuals to pursue money which it has been judicially decided is owed them."
Both the Law Society and CAS said it is important that new fees introduced to employment tribunals are also examined because -as reported in The Herald earlier this year - this has already led to an 81 per cent drop in cases.
Ms McPhee said: "The possibility of not receiving any award is made worse by the issue of fees to be paid up front to access a tribunal. Clients are often faced with the stark choice between risking the money they have to pay for a claim, or not being able to access justice."
A spokeswoman for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said: "The Government is determined to clamp down on businesses who fail to pay out.
"Under the proposals in the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill currently going through Parliament, businesses that fail to pay will face a penalty.
"This will help ensure employees get what they are entitled to and that there is a level playing field for the majority of honest employers who follow the rules."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article