Scottish voters have rejected the option of independence by the clear margin of 55% to 45%.
A record 84.6% of the electorate made their way to polling stations to make their voices heard.
The previous highest turnout in any UK election was 83.9% in the 1950 general election. Turnout at the last Holyrood election in 2011 just scraped above 50%.
While Glasgow voted in favour, the margin of victory was not large enough to give Alex Salmond and his campaign the momentum they need.
His deputy Nicola Sturgeon conceded defeat with a handful of results still to be declared.
The Deputy First Minister said there was a "real sense of disappointment that we have fallen narrowly short of securing a Yes vote".
Mr Salmond had been expected to make an appearance at the count at the Aberdeen Exhibition and Conference Centre but did not arrive, flying straight to Edinburgh before it was announced that voters in his constituency of Aberdeenshire had resoundingly rejected independence by 60.3% to 39.6%.
Gordon MP Sir Malcolm Bruce said: "This is the SNP's backyard, it's Alex Salmond's backyard. He didn't have the guts to come to his own count in his own area because he knew he had been comprehensively rejected."
Apart from Glasgow, there were wins for Yes in only three other of Scotland's 32 local authority areas - Dundee, West Dunbartonshire and North Lanarkshire - and damaging losses in other SNP strongholds like Perth & Kinross, Angus and Moray.
While there was a comfortable majority in Dundee, the turnout in the city was 78.8% - lower than many other parts of Scotland, indicating that the Yes campaign has not managed to get voters out in sufficient numbers. The turnout in Glasgow was even lower at 75%.
No won convincingly in Edinburgh and the result in Fife - where 114,148 voted Yes and 139,788 No - made the result a mathematical certainty.
In an early-morning phone call, Prime Minister David Cameron spoke to former Labour chancellor Alistair Darling, the leader of the cross-party Better Together campaign, to congratulate him on "a well-fought campaign".
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said: "I'm absolutely delighted the Scottish people have taken this momentous decision to safeguard our family of nations for future generations.
"In a dangerous and uncertain world I have no doubt we are stronger, safer, and more prosperous together than we ever could be apart.
"But a vote against independence was clearly not a vote against change and we must now deliver on time and in full the radical package of newly devolved powers to Scotland.
"At the same time, this referendum north of the border has led to demand for constitutional reform across the United Kingdom as people south of the border also want more control and freedom in their own hands rather than power being hoarded in Westminster.
"So this referendum marks not only a new chapter for Scotland within the UK but also wider constitutional reform across the Union."
The biggest donors to the Yes campaign, Lottery winners Chris and Colin Weir, who provided £2.5m, said in a statement: "Of course, we are deeply disappointed by the result. But the people of Scotland have made their decision and, as democrats, we accept the outcome.
"We have no regrets at all about our support for the Yes campaign in the last two years. As lifelong supporters of independence, we are very proud of what has been achieved.
"People from all sections of Scottish life have emerged in unprecedented numbers and articulated their aspirations for our country, some of them for the first time in their lives. Irrespective of the No vote, Scotland has shown overwhelmingly that she wants change - and politicians must ensure that is what happens next.
"For now, it's time for us all to come together as one nation, not two campaigns, to work for the best possible future for Scotland. The people of this country expect and deserve no less."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article