Shoppers in Scotland are likely to face higher prices if the country votes in favour of independence, one of the UK's leading retailers has warned.
John Lewis Partnership chairman Sir Charlie Mayfield said it had no intention of reducing its commercial presence north of the border, where it has nine shops, a contact centre and employs more than 3,000 people.
But he cautioned that firms were unlikely to continue sharing the burden of higher operating costs in Scotland across all UK customers in the event of the break up of the Union.
He said he would "regret" any move which damaged the retailers' partnership model.
"We have got a thriving business in Scotland, with nine shops, a contact centre and over 3,000 partners working there," Sir Charlie told BBC Radio 4's Today.
"The debate has clearly become very, very fractious. As a businessman it is not my place to tell Scottish voters how to vote in next week's referendum.
"But I will say two things.
"From a business perspective there will be economic consequences to a Yes vote, not just in uncertainty but some of the turmoil we are hearing about.
"And it is also the case that it does cost more money to trade in parts of Scotland and therefore those hard costs, in the event of a Yes vote, are more likely to be passed on."
He went on: "On the day after the referendum the shops are going to open on time, nothing will change.
"For various reasons - regulation and transport costs etc - it does currently cost more money to serve parts of Scotland.
"Most retailers don't run different prices, they absorb that in the totality.
"If you go forward several years and you see a divergence of different things - particularly currency - that creates the likelihood, not the certainty, that costs would be higher.
"And when you are talking about two different countries it is most probable that most retailers would then start pricing differently.
"My view would be that the likelihood is that that would lead to some higher prices."
Asked about the potential impact on the business model of the employee-owned business which operates department stores and Waitrose supermarkets, he said: "Whatever happens in the referendum, we will continue and work extremely hard to make sure that we continue to be one partnership.
"But I would regret anything, obviously, which started to create divergence and really significant differences in the two markets that made it harder to achieve that."
Scottish Finance Secretary John Swinney said other major retailers had rejected claims prices would rise.
"Charlie Mayfield is entitled to his opinion," he told Today.
"But I noticed at the weekend that the line of argument being pursued by the Better Together campaign - which is in a letter that has gone to all households or many households in Scotland - suggesting this very point in connection with Tesco was rubbished by Tesco at the weekend.
"So I think the argument is one that is firmly contested by other retailers."
Pro-independence campaigners called for the withdrawal of the leaflets after a letter emerged from Tesco customer services which said there was "no truth" in the claim.
The company said the referendum is a "matter for the Scottish people" and that it has a neutral position on the debate.
The costs of supplying food in different markets can vary depending on labour and energy costs and government levies on some products, Tesco said, but added that suggesting a Yes vote would lead to an increase in food prices was "entirely speculative".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article