UKIP in Scotland has been criticised after it gave a platform to an MEP from a far-right party formed by white supremacists.
A high-ranking politician from the Sweden Democrats, whose members used to attend meetings in Nazi-style uniforms, addressed a Ukip a meeting in Edinburgh recently.
SNP MSP Christian Allard described Ukip as an "embarrassment" to the No campaign. Ukip, although campaigning for the union, is not part of Better Together.
The party, which is opposed to mass immigration and the European Union, made its breakthrough in Scotland recently by getting an MEP elected.
It will make a major contribution to the independence referendum this coming Friday when leader Nigel Farage fronts a pro-Union rally.
The event has triggered security fears, as previous Farage visits have attracted hundreds of protestors.
Figures in Better Together, the official No campaign, are also said to be angered by the event, as it threatens to tarnish the image of the mainstream effort to keep Scotland in the Union.
The Sunday Herald can now reveal Ukip Scotland's association with far-right European politics. In June, it emerged Ukip was part of a wider European Parliament group that included what one Liberal Democrat source described as the "dregs" of the far right.
The Europe of Freedom and Democracy group includes the Sweden Democrats, founded in 1988 by racists and a former member of the Waffen SS.
It was only in 1995 that the party banned its members from wearing Nazi dress to meetings.
According to a Ukip Scotland circular to party members, a Sweden Democrats MEP was the special guest at a recent meeting in the capital.
He wrote: "We were also pleased to have Kristina Winberg MEP as guest speaker."
In June, Winberg and another party MEP released a statement in an attempt to distance themselves from their party's fascist past.
"We acknowledge and learn from our [the party's] mistakes," they said.
"The worst of these mistakes was that the party didn't distance itself from radical youths with subcultural looks and that these were allowed to participate in some of the party demonstrations."
However, last year a leading Sweden Democrats politician had to resign after she posted "I hope they starve to death" in response to an article about teenage asylum-seekers who had begun a hunger strike.
The SNP's Allard said yesterday: "This is just another example of the type of party Ukip is - which is exactly why their support is such an embarrassment to the No campaign in the referendum.
"While Yes is the biggest grass-roots political campaign in Scotland's history, the No campaign counts on the support of the likes of Ukip. And with parties like Ukip urging a No vote, it's absolutely no surprise that more and more people are switching from No to Yes as we get closer to polling day."
Colin Fox, co-convener of the Scottish Socialist party, said: "It is preposterous to see who Farage and his fellow right-wingers line up with. They are completely out of touch with the social democratic mainstream in Scotland. It is also another reminder of how embarrassing Farage's trip to Glasgow is for Better Together."
A Ukip spokesman said: "The Sweden Democrats as a party never had a policy of white supremacy or of wearing uniforms. The party has changed dramatically in the last 10 years with a new leader, a new political platform which expelled any extremists and acknowledges past mistakes.
"The very amiable Kristina Winberg is a member of a moderate patriotic party which is polling at 15% in Sweden."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article