Police investigations in Scotland of alleged child abuse cases involving a number of victims and multiple accused have so far resulted in 21 referrals to the procurator fiscal.
The nature of the alleged crimes and the fact that a "significant proportion" of the perpetrators identified are from an ethnic minority background has led to comparisons with the scandal exposed in Rotherham last week.
A team led by Scotland's former chief inspector of social work Professor Alexis Jay reported that more than 1,400 children had been abused in the Yorkshire town, and that authorities including the police had failed to intervene despite knowing about wide-ranging sexual exploitation.
In Scotland two investigations have been running into the abuse of vulnerable children in and around Glasgow. Operation Cotswold, set up in 2011 was later subsumed into Operation Dash. Several of the inquiries have already resulted in live cases.
The charity Barnardo's has been working with police to bring cases to court. Some of the young people did not see themselves as victims, and police have attempted to disrupt the activities of alleged perpetrators instead.
Martin Crewe, Barnardo's Scotland director, said the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service had concerns some witnesses lacked credibility, or would not do well under cross examination. "We should look at the system and how we can make the evidence-gathering from vulnerable witnesses better," he said.
Shadow UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper yesterday said the law should change to make it an offence to fail to report allegations of child abuse.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article