A FORMER employee of a national park authority has lost her case for unfair dismissal after being sacked for sending emails containing "sensitive" information to her husband.
Iona Hyde, a former trees and woodland officer with Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority, sent her partner Mike Hyde confidential data about a planning application.
Mr Hyde is a private planning consultant and Mrs Hyde sent him a copy of recommendations she had made in an application involving one of his clients who was objecting to it.
The authority found she had acted inappropriately, creating a conflict of interest, and sacked her for gross misconduct.
Mrs Hyde claimed she was unaware she should not have sent the emails, but employment judge Rosemary Sorrell said this defence was "implausible".
In a written judgment in the case, the judge added: "In respect of [Mrs Hyde], the tribunal found that, whilst she gave her evidence in a clear and straightforward manner, we did not find her to be a particularly honest or credible witness."
The tribunal heard Mrs Hyde had worked with the authority for ten years and was the only expert of her kind employed at the national park.
She said she had not been trained on what she was allowed to share with interested parties.
The park authority argued she was an experienced member of staff who would have been well aware of procedures.
Judge Sorrell agreed and said that by sending the information to her husband she had given him a competitive advantage.
She added that Fiona Logan, the park's chief executive, "gave credible evidence that there were a number of emails the claimant shared with Mr Hyde in his role as agent between 2011 and 2013 without authority, outwith her remit and in breach of confidentiality".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article