A 250-square-mile haven has been established to save the Scottish wildcat from threatened extinction.
The west coast sanctuary is being cleared of feral domestic cats that pose a threat by interbreeding with their endangered cousins. Wildcats are threatened by hybridising with domestic cats, with one study suggesting there could just 35 left in the wild.
The Wildcat Haven, funded by American animal welfare organisations, occupies the Ardnamurchan and Sunart peninsula on the west coast, and has been the site of assiduous work over the last five years to trap, neuter and release feral cats and ensure pet cats are neutered.
The team behind it hope that wildcats may now be able to thrive in the area secure from the further threat of hybridisation.
The project scientific adviser, Dr Paul O'Donoghue, of the University of Chester, said: "Cats of any kind are notoriously difficult to survey. However over the last six months we've really saturated the area with live traps, cameras, vets and ecologists, and had lots of people from the local community out looking as well.
"The only feral cats seen have already been neutered, which means the population should collapse naturally within the next couple of years."
This is thought to be the first time feral cats have been managed in such a large mainland area anywhere in the world.
Camera trap footage, using remote motion-sensor cameras, suggests that Ardnamurchan's wildcats, which could number fewer than 10, might be genetically pure.
The animals will be trapped and DNA tested to establish whether this is the case. If they are, they will be left to thrive and simply monitored, in the hope and expectation that their population will grow. Keeping the cats where they are and protecting them in their own environment is the ideal scenario.
But if the population turns out to be made up of hybrids then discussions will be held with with other agencies about the best way forward. As a last resort, wildcats could be brought to Ardnamurchan from areas of Scotland where Dr O'Donoghue believes they are "doomed", such as the Cairngorms, or from captivity.
Dr O'Donoghue said: "Our goal is to establish populations of genetically-pure wildcats. We are determined not to settle for second best or to settle for a bunch of tabbies that bear a resemblance to wildcats. Protecting anything less than the pure Scottish wildcat will condemn the species to extinction. The behaviour of feral cats and pure wildcats is very different. Scotland's ecology needs the true wildcat and, outside of a wildlife park enclosure, this is the only place in the UK where they are safe from hybridisation."
The area is protected by a heavily monitored buffer zone at a geographic bottleneck which feral cats could not easily migrate past.
Dr O'Donoghue believes this approach is the only way to save the wildcat and would now like to see it expanded on an national scale. "If we had the funding available, we would be very confident of saving the wildcat; the only thing that limits the scale of the Haven project is lack of funding."
Last September, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) announced a £2 million, six-year plan to reverse the wildcat's decline, but the effort was criticised by the Scottish Wildcat Association (SWA), which said SNH's broad definition of what constituted a wildcat would lead to the protection of hybridised cats instead of true wildcats. Steve Piper, previously SWA's chairman, who founded the haven project with the SWA in 2008, said it was "the only future the Scottish wildcat has", adding: "This is a huge achievement for everyone involved. Wildcat Haven is easily five years ahead of the SNH action plan and people need to get behind it." He believes it is a good model which could be replicated by SNH elsewhere in Scotland.
A spokesman for SNH said: "We haven't seen this work, but would be really interested in doing so."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article