Support for Scottish independence has slipped, according to a new poll.
Backing for a Yes vote in September's referendum has fallen to 35%, while 54% said they would vote No, a YouGov poll for The Times said.
A further 10% said they were undecided, while 2% said they would not vote.
Without undecided voters or those who would not vote, the results were 39% for Yes, and 61% for No.
The results represent a slight decrease in support for independence, and a slight increase in backing for a No vote compared with the last YouGov poll for the newspaper in March.
Commenting on the results, Better Together campaign director Blair McDougall said: "This poll is a major setback to Alex Salmond's negative and divisive campaign.
"The more people think about the consequences of breaking up the UK for jobs, pensions and public services, the more they are saying No Thanks to separation.
"There will be no let-up from our campaign over the summer. We will be working hard for every vote until the polls close on September 18.
"We have a positive vision for Scotland that is winning over swing voters. We can have the best of both worlds for Scotland - a strong Scottish Parliament, with the guarantee of more powers, backed up by the strength, security and stability of being part of the larger UK. Only separation puts that at risk."
The poll also questioned people about whether they thought Scotland would be economically better or worse off under independence.
It found that 27% believed the country would be better off, 49% believed it would be worse off, 11% said there would be no difference and 13% did not know.
Meanwhile, 17% said they believed they would be personally financially better off under independence, 43% said worse off, 23% said no difference and 17% did not know.
YouGov interviewed 1,206 Scottish adults between June 25 and 29.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article