Shredded, the thumping great book on Royal Bank of Scotland by Sunday Herald compadre Ian Fraser, was formally launched in Edinburgh last week at a do attended by the cream of Scotland's hack pack as well as some of the book's sources and assorted maverick financiers.
Those who imagined that Fred Goodwin might jump out of a cake in Friday the 13th costume came away disappointed.
Journalists are a rivalrous race, and not always quick to compliment their fellows, but one attendee gave three reasons for being there: 1: Fraser's unflinching post-mortem on the RBS debacle has "redeemed the Scottish press's tarnished reputation" (ie, none of the hack pack raised the alarm about what Fred was doing when he was doing it). 2: He has performed a public service, as no-one without his obsessive energy and head for arcane financial detail could have. 3: The book is a great inspiration to would-be young investigative journalists.
The first of these points is controversial - there are a handful journalists who did blow whistles, it's just that no-one was listening.
The best that can be said is that the scale of the general disgrace means that it can never happen again. Right?
All's well that ends well for Scottish Water's Kirriemuir outfall pipeline, which, as we reported more than a year ago, languished for many months in a half-finished state to the bemusement of local landowners. The pipeline is now done and dusted, without extra spending of public money.
We may never know why, given that they "undertake hundreds of infrastructure projects across Scotland ever year", Scottish Water's planners started to lay their giant pipe before sorting out the legal niceties along the route.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article