FATIGUE cracks in the main gearbox have been blamed for the ditchings of two North Sea helicopters.
Air accident investigators have today published the findings of their probe into two separate incidents in 2012, which both involved EC225 helicopters carrying oil workers. No one was seriously injured in either ditching.
In May 2012, the crew of an EC225 Super Puma flying east of Aberdeen was forced to make an emergency landing in the North Sea following a loss of oil pressure in the main rotor gearbox and the apparent failure of the emergency lubrication system to kick in.
In October that year, a second EC225 Super Puma ditched off the Shetland islands in identical circumstances.
A report by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch has concluded that the "loss of oil pressure in both helicopters was caused by a failure of the bevel gear vertical shaft in the main rotor gearbox, which drives the pumps".
The report continues: "The shafts had failed as a result of a circumferential fatigue crack in the area where the two parts of the shaft are welded together...the emergency lubrication system operated in both cases, but the system warning light illuminated as a result of an incompatibility between the helicopter wiring and the pressure switches."
A number of safety recommendations relating to the EC225 gearbox flaws have already been issued in the aftermath of the 2012 incidents, but the AAIB have also called for improvements to emergency checklists, life-rafts and the crash position indicator, which alerts rescuers to the location of a ditched aircraft.
The 2012 incidents are among a string of offshore helicopters crashes and ditchings which have led to tougher safety regulations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article