THE new head of the European Commission needs to "get it" on reform in the wake of last week's eurosceptic poll results, David Cameron has insisted.
He spoke as opinion on the continent against his opposition to the candidacy of veteran federalist Jean-Claude Juncker hardened.
On the campaign trail in the Newark by-election, the Prime Minister was asked why he was against the former premier of Luxembourg, whom "nobody has ever heard of".
He replied: "We need people running these organisations, whether it's the European Council, the European Commission or indeed any other part of Europe...that understand an open, flexible, competitive Europe that respects nation states and realises that the process of getting too big, too bossy, too interfering has gone too far and needs to be rolled back .
"So that's what matters when it comes to these people, as you say, that no one has ever heard of. We need people that get it. That is my clear instruction on this and I look forward to the continued debate in Europe."
Earlier No 10 highlighted a point made by Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, last week that there can be "no sense of automaticity" when it comes to appointing the person to succeed Jose Manuel Barroso at the Commission.
However, since expressing coolness about Mr Juncker's candidacy last week after an informal Brussels summit, Mrs Merkel, after facing pressure at home, has come out strongly in favour of the former Luxembourg Prime Minister.
Elsewhere, Tony Blair said the role of the Commission presidency should go to "the best person" but indicated it should be a reformer.
In a speech at the London Business School, the former PM set out an agenda for change in Europe, warning it would be "complacent and dangerous" to ignore the rise of eurosceptics. He argued Britain must lead reform rather than sever ties with Brussels. "People can understand that immigration may be a good thing but they want some rules and order about it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article