ANNIE Lennox has sparked anger among pro-independence supporters after posting a photo of a Union flag online.
The singer was targeted with a string of online messages after she appeared to show support for the No campaign. The former Eurythmics star, 59, took a picture of a Union flag on display in a shop window in London.
She posted it on her Facebook page and said: "Out and about in London Town.. something almost quaintly old fashioned about this Union Jack in a shop window. It seems to have lost some of the connotations that made me feel uncomfortable back in the day."
The post sparked a heated debate on the Sweet Dreams singer's website, with some accusing her of sending a subliminal message that she wanted Scots to vote no.
Lawrence Target wrote: "Don't you dare come out against our independence. Inform yourself, for this is a new and beautiful horizon for Scotland and a better future for our children."
Lennox later attempted to calm tempers by saying: "Folks, just a mention, I can't vote on the issue of Scottish independence as I don't live in Scotland. The people who reside there will decide for themselves what they want to do.
"My flag post yesterday had no hidden message or agenda."
However, her comments led to calls for her to avoid posting similar images in case it influenced her fans. Lenny Lane wrote: "I understand your position Annie. However, like it or not, you are viewed as an ambassador for all good things Scottish. You're a smart and respected lady. Perhaps some discretion is needed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article