A PRO-UNION blogger who was barred from Ukip for questioning the Holocaust has become the first individual to register as an official campaigner in the independence referendum.
Alistair McConnachie, who disputes that Nazis used gas chambers to murder Jews, is now legally entitled to spend up to £150,000 in support of a No vote.
He registered with the Electoral Commission as a so-called "permitted participant" last week, a sign he intends to spend at least £10,000 of his own money or donations.
Glasgow-based McConnachie, 48, was Ukip's Scottish organiser between 1999 and 2001, and stood as a Ukip candidate five times.
However, in late 2001, the party refused to renew his membership because of comments he made about the killing of Jews at
In an email to party members, he said: "I don't accept that gas chambers were used to execute Jews for the simple fact there is no direct physical evidence to show that such gas chambers ever existed ... There are no photographs or films of execution gas chambers ... Alleged eyewitness accounts are revealed as false or highly exaggerated."
McConnachie also claimed the Pope was duped over the Holocaust and attacked the Board of Deputies of British Jews, prompting some Ukip members to resign from the party's executive.
The controversy began in 2000 when McConnachie wrote to newspapers questioning how many Jews had died at Auschwitz and citing American "expert" Fred Leuchter, who claimed there were no gas chambers at the concentration camp.
McConnachie also accused the Board of Deputies of "seeking to establish a monopoly in the marketplace of ideas" because it complained to the BBC for running two interviews with the Holocaust denier David Irving.
Ukip initially expelled McConnachie for five years for bringing the party into disrepute, but this was reduced on appeal to a one-year suspension from the executive.
At the time, McConnachie said he had been defending his "private right to free speech within the law" but Ukip refused to renew his membership. After Ukip, McConnachie formed his own party, Independent Green Voice, and stood as its candidate three times.
In 2007, he wrote that he was not a Holocaust denier but was "quite prepared to accept that six million Jews perished in the Holocaust", but retained his doubts about gas chambers.
"Regarding the Holocaust, the most that could be said is that I've questioned, and doubt from a historically interested point of view, some aspects, specifically with regard to the existence of execution gas chambers."
Since March 2012, McConnachie has run a pro-Union website called aforceforgood.org.uk, which carries essays and graphics, many of the Union flag and the phrase "Gonna vote naw". It argues against more powers for Holyrood because "the presence of a significant separatist movement", in the form of the SNP, means "devolving power will always be potentially dangerous to a union".
SNP MSP Stewart Maxwell called on the pro-Union Better Together campaign to distance itself from McConnachie, saying: "Mr McConnachie's repulsive views denying the Holocaust are stomach-churning - even Ukip disciplined him for that.
"He is entitled to vote and work for a No, but he has gone further than that by formally associating himself with the No campaign. Therefore, in the interests of decency and a civilised debate, we would urge David Cameron to dissociate himself from Mr McConnachie and suggest that [Better Together chair] Alistair Darling writes to him requesting that he deregister as a permitted participant."
A Better Together spokesman said: "The fact that we had to Google this guy tells you all you need to know about his links to our campaign."
McConnachie hung up on the Sunday Herald when contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article