The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is suffering a severe and worsening shortage of skilled nuclear engineers that could threaten the safety of nuclear weapons and submarines on the Clyde.
Official figures released by the MoD reveal that one in 10 nuclear safety posts - both civilian and military - are vacant. The MoD's own safety watchdog has warned that the staffing crisis poses "a significant threat to the safe delivery of the defence nuclear programme".
The revelations have been described as utterly shocking by the SNP's Westminster defence spokesman, Angus Robertson MP. "To find out there are so many vacancies in critical nuclear positions is totally unacceptable," he told the Sunday Herald.
"This is extremely dangerous and unsustainable and lays bare the reality of the risks of the shambolic MoD cuts agenda. The MoD must immediately explain what it is doing to rectify this and when."
Robertson was told by the UK Defence Equipment and personnel Minister, Philip Dunne, that the MoD was short of 165 suitably qualified and experienced nuclear personnel on March 31, 2014.
Some 60 of those vacancies relate to nuclear submarine activities, and 26 vacancies are at the Faslane and Coulport nuclear bases in Argyll.
Across all its conventional and nuclear land, sea and air operations the MoD has disclosed that it had 97 vacancies for 1321 posts it categorised as "safety critical" on April 1, 2014. In its annual safety report for 2012-13, it said its target was to get these vacancies down below 50.
The report described the overall shortage of suitably qualified and experience staff as "the top departmental safety concern".
Although the MoD insists that none of vacancies defined as "safety critical" is in nuclear operations, it has repeatedly been warned by its own advisers that nuclear safety is at risk. The Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator, the MoD's internal watchdog, has described shortages of skilled nuclear staff as "the principal threat to safety in the defence nuclear programme in the medium term".
Its report for 2012-13 warned of future problems because qualified staff were "spread thinly in places".
The report pointed out that there was an ageing demographic issue because nuclear engineers were approaching retirement and not enough were being recruited and trained in their place. There was also increasing competition from the civil nuclear power industry, which is seeking to expand in England and Wales, it said.
Staff shortages were also highlighted in a heavily censored 2009 "risk register" released by the MoD under freedom of information law. John Large, an independent nuclear engineer who has advised governments, argued the latest MoD figures underestimated the seriousness of the staff shortages.
The redefinition of some jobs suggested that the MoD had moved the goalposts, he said.
"The nuclear safety implications arising from this could be onerous," he continued. He pointed out that nuclear engineers would face increasing challenges as submarines aged and developed unexpected problems.
The MoD insisted, however, that the vacancies had not impacted on its ability to safety deliver the Government's military nuclear programme. The Defence Nuclear Safety Regulator had agreed that current safety had not been compromised, it pointed out.
No nuclear submarines are sent to sea without the "required personnel" onboard, said an MoD spokeswoman.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article