SEVERAL of the country's wealthiest landowners will become even richer under new agricultural support plans being developed by the Scottish Government, it has been claimed.
Ministers are trying to reform the current system, which last year paid one farmer more than £3 million of public money. They want to find a way to pay "active" farmers more while closing the loopholes that allow so-called "slipper farmers" to be paid large sums for doing nothing.
But land reform campaigner Andy Wightman has said that under the current plans, ministers risk simply rewarding the largest landowners while smaller farms and crofters lose out.
He has calculated that the Duke of Westminster, who owns 37,303 hectares of eligible land in Sutherland, could qualify for £764,712 for each of the next six years, although he made no claim last year.
The Duke of Roxburgh received £204,374 in 2013 and his 4637 hectares in the Borders could attract support of £950,585 per year under the new rules.
Meanwhile, Smech Properties Ltd, a company belonging to Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the King of Dubai and Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates, owns an estate in south west Ross-shire that received £26,406 in 2013 but could be eligible for £439,192 a year until 2020, according to Mr Wightman.
Even the Queen, who does not claim, could receive more than half a million pounds for the 25,000 hectares of Balmoral Estate.
Mr Wightman is also concerned that, instead of the new system being introduced in 2015, it will be phased in over the next six years.
He said that would mean Frank Smart, who farms near Banchory and received £3.22m last year under the existing system, would continue to receive a large proportion of his payments until 2020.
The existing system of farm subsidies, awarded under the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), is coming to an end in December 2015 and the Scottish Government is currently finalising the details of the new scheme that will run until 2020.
Currently, Single Farm Payments are awarded to farmers on the basis of what they received in 2000-2002, with the amounts paid based on their farming activity at that time.
Mr Wightman said: "Some farmers 'gamed' the system by increasing their farming activity in those years, and thus have done very well out of it over the past decade."
From next year, a new Basic Payments System of farming subsidies will be introduced. It will be a fixed payment per hectare of land farmed, with one rate of €20-€25 (£16-£21) for rough grazing and €200-€250 (£165-£205) for better-quality land.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said that unlike in the last 10 years, farmers would have to demonstrate they meet minimum activity levels, to help clamp down on "slipper" farming.
She said: "Scotland needs a CAP that supports dirty wellies and not comfy slippers, and we need to ensure only active farmers are supported under the new CAP. As Scottish farmers will have the lowest payments rates in Europe, it is even more essential that this support is directed towards genuine farmers."
But Patrick Krause, chief executive of the Scottish Crofting Federation, said there was a great deal of uncertainty. "The fact they are talking about paying so much less to those on rough grazing less is very worrying for crofters," he said.
The landowners organisation Scottish Land & Estates also has concerns, although Andrew Midgley, its head of policy, said members did not want to see the emergence of a new 'slipper farmer' issue. "The further we get from the 2000-2002 historic reference period, the more unsustainable and iniquitous the system has become," he said.
However, he added it should not be assumed there would be a bonanza for landowners and that area payments represented a positive step forward.
Mr Smart could not be contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article