RISK-TAKERS and gamblers are more likely to vote Yes in the independence referendum, a major academic study has found.
The study, headed by Professor David Bell of Stirling University, found a clear link between people's willingness to take risks in life and their support for independence.
The findings, to be presented at a seminar in Edinburgh tomorrow, partly explain why men are significantly more likely to back a Yes vote than women, the academic said.
The research was based on a survey by pollsters YouGov of 2000 people late last year. It is part of an ongoing programme of studies about the referendum supported by the politically neutral Economic and Social Research Council.
Professor Bell used a series of questions to identify people's willingness to take risks. Answers were cross-referenced with their referendum voting intentions.
Mr Bell said: "It emerged it is those willing to take risks who are more likely to vote Yes. It is perfectly logical and this partly explains the difference between men and women [in supporting independence]."
In the survey women saw themselves as less willing to take risks, on average, than men. The findings are likely to be seized upon by the pro-UK campaign, which has said the SNP's plans for independence include a number of uncertainties.
The No campaign has argued there are no guarantees over the currency of an independent Scotland or the terms for it to join the European Union.
The findings are also likely to prompt wider discussion of gender differences. The gap between men and women in terms of support for independence has long been recognised.
Social researcher Rachel Ormston found that in 19 opinion polls conducted between the start of the year and the middle of last month, women were on average 13 percentage points less likely than men to vote Yes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article